Circular reasoning: start with the conclusion, and the geometry proves itself right. A radial, graphic study of paradox — bold enough to anchor a lobby wall, precise enough to hang in a study.
"Circular Logic" (also known as paradoxical thinking or circular reasoning), is a logical fallacy in which "the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying to end up with". The individual components of a circular argument will sometimes be logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true, and will not lack relevance.